Make it easier to find the right provider—and understand the available experience data.
The directory combines source-backed clinician information with easier search tools. Separately, Compass collects positive and negative experiences, supporting documents, corroborated information, and public records so approved review profiles can mature without confusing directory inclusion with endorsement.
Transparency has to be inspectable.
Compass separates the Practice Rating from Evidence Confidence, publishes only repeated patterns, offers providers a right of reply, and keeps pending material out of public scores.
Reporter identities stay private
The directory publishes aggregate signals, not individual patient stories.
Positive and concern data use the same gate
The same review and repeated-pattern rules apply in both directions.
Providers can answer the record
Right-of-reply and provider statements are part of the public architecture.
Independence of the directory
Aeromedical Compass is presented as its own public-facing resource. Provider ratings are generated from Compass's published methodology and approved Compass data, not from an advocacy position or a desired outcome for any individual provider.
Organizational operation and legal disclosures are available in the Terms of Use.